![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||||||||
![]() |
At Inalytics, we enhance your selection process by providing evidence of whether short-listed managers have the skills to meet your targets, differentiating between them using objective measures of skill and providing you with a list of specific questions which we believe need to be raised during the interview process. This investigative process leads to truly informed and confident decisions. Typical problems encountered Experience shows that shortlists are typically made of managers with good track records, impressive marketing materials and good sales people: a package that looks great on paper but very often fails to deliver the right results. It is hardly surprising that Pension Funds remain challenged with respect to:
How we help We can help by focusing on the observable facts in terms of the added value from each trade and portfolio position (including stocks underweighted or the shorts) to identify repeatable patterns of behaviour and persistent skill. This will allow you to:
How the service works Inalytics’ selection service complements and enhances your own and your Consultant’s Due Diligence process. In effect we pick up where your Consultant leaves off. Once the short list has been drawn up, the managers are requested to provide holdings and trade data for a representative portfolio. Inalytics will generate the analysis. The results are summarised in easily understandable reports and supported by access to the underlying information through a web portal. Inalytics also provides you with our thoughts on the data, drawing on our experience as ex-fund managers, and a list of pertinent questions to ask the manager. Monitoring for Pension Funds |
![]() |
John Moore, |
| | Contact us | Glossary | Terms and Conditions | Site Map | Privacy | |







